Logo
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Login
Skip to content
  • Home
  • Services
    • For Healthcare
      • Revenue Cycle Management
        • Solution
        • Benefits
      • Clinical Documentation Improvement
        • Organization
          • Providers
          • Solution Highlights
          • Comparion
        • Solutions
          • Decrease Costs
          • Maximize Productivity
          • EHR Integration
          • Data Integrity
        • Interfaces
      • Healthcare Information Technology
    • For Business
      • Information Technology
      • Management Services
      • Software Development
      • Legal Transcription
    • For Government
      • Goverment Subcontracting
      • Business Solution
      • IT Staffing
  • Company
    • About
    • Leadership
    • Our Partners
    • Career
  • Contact
  • Providers
  • Solution
    Hightlights
  • Comparion
← back
Services > Healthcare > Clinical Documentation Improvement > Healthcare Organizations > Documentation Capture Model Comparison

Documentation Capture Model Comparison

Point and Click

Point and Click

An industry survey reveals these key findings from clinicians:
  • 93% negate that working with an EHR reduces time spent documenting care
  • 67% respond that using a keyboard and mouse to document within an EHR proved to be a serious impediment to efficiency and therefore an obstacle to adoption.
  • 97% prefer a narrative — rather than structured data entry — as the more valuable resource in treating patients.
  • 96% believe that the patient’s individual story becomes lost using data entry.

Several studies and publicly available data echo the same observations:

  • The AC Group reports a 73% failure rate of EHRs due to usability frustrations. "Failure" was defined as not using EHR for 80% of their patients.
  • The group also reviewed 573 charts and found that entering data into the EHR took an average of 9 times longer than dictating a patient encounter.
  • If a health care provider sees an average of 20 patients each day, this translates to 180 minutes a day. The result: Providers either will see fewer patients or work longer hours.
FINDINGS: Documentation is more time-consuming, user adoption is low and the resulting records are less desirable than narrative text
Front End Speech

Front End Speech

Front-end speech recognition, where words are displayed as they are spoken, require the provider to be responsible for engine training as well as, editing and signing the document.
  • Even with the latest advancements in speech recognition software, shortcomings can induce errors in the transcribed reports and thus seriously affect the outcome of treatment.
  • In many cases, SR means tethering physicians to a workstation, sometimes a specific workstation that recognizes their voice.
  • In order for SR to be as accurate as possible, a user must immediately correct the errors made by the software so the program will "learn" the intricacies of the user’s speech patterns.
  • Accuracy rates are touted to range from 70-99%, but even at 99% accuracy documents will require editing to ensure the 1% does not impact patient care
  • Front-end SR takes considerably longer to use effectively than it does to simply dictate.
FINDINGS: Software accuracy is unreliable and documentation is more time-consuming when providers are required to edit and "teach" the program
The Emdat Approach

The Emdat Approach

Provider documentation complements the implementation and utilization of an EHR system.

A hybrid approach accomplishes documentation goals without affecting physician performance.

  • Capitalizes on dictation, the most efficient means of documenting patient encounters.
  • Narrative documents can be quickly reviewed and distributed to external systems.
  • Supports Meaningful Use requirements by auto-popultaing EHR data templates with data derived from dictation.
  • Trained medical professionals transcribe documents in a medical transcription platform that integrates closely with EHRs, providing content review and quick turnaround
SUCCESSES: Physician productivity is maximized, physician workflow and revenue capacity is retained, and patient encounters are documented comprehensively
Image1

For healthcare

Read More
Image2

For Business

Read More
Image3

For government

Read More
testimonials :
  • Panacea Pro has provided our practice with phenomenal Clinical Documentaion Improvement service.......Read More

    Herman C. Gist, MD - ABC Cardiology Consultants PC.

  • I am very happy with their customer service because they explain and translate their answers ........Read More

    Nabil Y. Khawand, MD - Diplomate of The American Board of Urology and Kidney Transplantation.

  • I have been using Panacea Pro's services for many years and have been extremely ..........Read More

    Felasfa M. Wodajo, MD - Musculoskeletal Tumor Surgery

  • We have a unique psychiatric practice where we see everyone in civil and forensic services.........Read More

    Benjamin A. Adewale, MD - President - Riverside Mental Health.

  • I am very impressed with Panacea Pro's quality of work and extremely fast turn-around time.

    J. Richard Wells, MD - Orthopaedic Surgery

  • I have been a satisfied client of Panacea Pro since January of 2008. I have found the........Read More

    Marc F. Schlosberg, MD - Metropolitan DC Neurology

Company
  • About
  • Leadership
  • Our Partners
  • Career
  •  
Industry
  • Healthcare
  • Business
  • Government
  •  
  •  
Solutions
  • Revenue Cycle Management
  • Clinical Documentation Improvement
  • Information Technology
  • Business Solutions
  • Government Solutions
Social Media
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  •  
© 2013 Panacea Pro Corporation. All rights reserved.
Legal | Sitemap | Contact